From The Mana World
m |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:I think such a landscape would result in pretty boring maps as there are few natural obstacles. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] 02:13, 13 September 2007 (CEST) | :I think such a landscape would result in pretty boring maps as there are few natural obstacles. --[[User:Crush|Crush]] 02:13, 13 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
::Without mountains you can still have steep natural walls, just not that tall (1-3 tiles). And how about big slabs of rock and cravices? What's the difference between that and a desert?[[User:Modanung|Modanung]] 14:13, 26 September 2007 (CEST) | ::Without mountains you can still have steep natural walls, just not that tall (1-3 tiles). And how about big slabs of rock and cravices? What's the difference between that and a desert? [[User:Modanung|Modanung]] 14:13, 26 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 12:22, 26 September 2007
I personally was thinking of this continent as pretty bare. Rocky with some ruins. The middle part being low and to the west and east the height would increase. Watch out not to make a small enviroment too rich when it comes to variation in landscape. Desert, plains, forest, jungle AND mountains? I think that's way too much. I imagined this island to be a bit like Iceland. Mainly these parts of Iceland:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NesjavellirPowerPlant_edit2.jpg
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gr%C3%ADmsey_Iceland.JPG
Water in the middle and steep cliffs at the East and West coast. Don't get me wrong, the map looks ok. But it's just way too much packed in a small enviroment if you ask me. Modanung 00:53, 13 September 2007 (CEST)
- I think such a landscape would result in pretty boring maps as there are few natural obstacles. --Crush 02:13, 13 September 2007 (CEST)
- Without mountains you can still have steep natural walls, just not that tall (1-3 tiles). And how about big slabs of rock and cravices? What's the difference between that and a desert? Modanung 14:13, 26 September 2007 (CEST)
